Lewis v. State

547 So. 2d 1031, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1975, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4702, 1989 WL 97591
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1989·No. No. 87-1373·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that the defendant, convicted of robbery with a firearm, cannot be convicted of the separate crime of display of a firearm while committing that robbery. Hall v. State, 517 So.2d 678 (Fla. 1988) (defendant may not be punished twice for the single act of displaying a firearm or carrying a firearm while committing a robbery). No reversible error is shown by the other points raised on appeal. See Ross v. State, 474 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1985); Wilkerson v. State, 461 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

The conviction and sentence for robbery are affirmed; the conviction for display of a firearm is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, 547 So. 2d 1031, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1975, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4702, 1989 WL 97591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

547 So. 2d 1031 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E.H. v. State
552 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)