Lewis v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.3d 40
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided July 7, 2020·No. 556, 2019·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NA-QUAN LEWIS, § § Defendant Below, § No. 556, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. I.D. No. 1905009613 (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: June 22, 2020 Decided: July 7, 2020

Before VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause, the appellant’s response, and

the appellee’s reply, it appears to the Court that:

(1) Following a two-day trial in December 2019, a Superior Court jury

found the appellant, Na-Quan Lewis, not guilty of several weapons-related charges

and guilty of a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct. The Superior Court

sentenced Lewis for the disorderly-conduct offense to thirty days of imprisonment,

with no probation to follow.

(2) Lewis filed a notice of appeal from the Superior Court’s sentencing

order. The Clerk of this Court issued a notice directing Lewis to show cause why

the appeal should not be dismissed because the sentence fails to meet the jurisdictional threshold for appeal to this Court. In response to the notice to show

cause, Lewis asserts that he desires to appeal the Superior Court’s failure to dismiss

the weapons-related charges.

(3) This Court’s constitutional jurisdiction over appeals by defendants in

criminal matters is limited to cases “in which the sentence shall be death,

imprisonment exceeding one month, or fine exceeding One Hundred Dollars.”1 The

Court does not have jurisdiction to receive an appeal by a defendant from charges of

which the jury found the defendant not guilty.2 Because the sentence imposed in

this case does not meet the jurisdictional requirement, the appeal must be dismissed.3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice

1 DEL. CONST. art. IV, § 11(1)(b). 2 Id. 3 Reese v. State, 2014 WL 4059213 (Del. Aug. 15, 2014); Marker v. State, 450 A.2d 397 (Del. 1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, (Del. 2020).

Lewis v. State (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marker v. State
450 A.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1982)