Lewis v. Shinn

D. Arizona

Lewis v. Shinn

DecidedMarch 31, 2023

Docket4:21-cv-00225

StatusUnknown

This text of Lewis v. Shinn (Lewis v. Shinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Shinn, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Ajelina Louise Roth Lewis, No. CV-21-00225-TUC-JAS

10 Petitioner, ORDER

11 v.

12 David Shinn, et al.,

13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 16 Magistrate Judge Ferraro that recommends denying and dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for 17 Writ of Habeas Corpus. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 18 objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 19 As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 20 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s 21 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 22 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 23 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, 24 IT IS ORDERED as follows: 25 (1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted and 26 adopted. 27 (2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied. 28 (3) The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. 1 Dated this 31st day of March, 2023. 2 3 A ashe. Honorable James A. Soto 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Ajelina Louise Roth Lewis, No. CV-21-00225-TUC-JAS

10 Petitioner, ORDER

11 v.

12 David Shinn, et al.,

13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 16 Magistrate Judge Ferraro that recommends denying and dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for 17 Writ of Habeas Corpus. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 18 objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 19 As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 20 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s 21 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 22 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 23 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, 24 IT IS ORDERED as follows: 25 (1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted and 26 adopted. 27 (2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied. 28 (3) The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. 1 Dated this 31st day of March, 2023. 2 3 A ashe. Honorable James A. Soto 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Lewis v. Shinn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-shinn-azd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack