Lewis v. Shafer Project Resources, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 01, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
MICHAEL LEWIS, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-353 § SHAFER PROJECT RESOURCES, INC., § § Defendant. §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On August 4, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R, D.E. 204), recommending that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (D.E. 197) be granted and that the individual claims of Terry Albee and Dale Totten be dismissed for failure to cooperate with discovery as representative plaintiffs. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 204), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss (D.E. 197) is GRANTED and the individual claims of Terry Albee and Dale Totten are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED this Ist day of September, 2021. Lb GONZALER RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. Shafer Project Resources, Inc. (Lewis v. Shafer Project Resources, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.