Lewis v. Seigel
239 A.D. 864
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 239 A.D. 864 (Lewis v. Seigel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lewis v. Seigel, 239 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Heffernan, JJ., [865]*865concur; Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur in affirmance as to defendant Seigel, but dissent and vote for reversal and dismissal as to defendant Roe.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-seigel-nyappdiv-1933.