Lewis v. Schack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewis v. Schack

98 A.D.3d 742, 950 N.Y.S.2d 487

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 29, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.D.3d 742 (Lewis v. Schack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Schack, 98 A.D.3d 742, 950 N.Y.S.2d 487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Arthur M. Schack, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to take certain action in connection with a motion made in an underlying civil action entitled Miller v Lewis, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 11358/09.

Adjudged that the petition is denied as academic, and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been' rendered academic in light of the motion schedule fixed in the underlying matter by the re[743]*743spondent Arthur M. Schack. Dickerson, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Arthur M. Schack, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to take certain action in connection with a motion made in an underlying civil action entitled Miller v Lewis, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 11358/09.

Adjudged that the petition is denied as academic, and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been' rendered academic in light of the motion schedule fixed in the underlying matter by the re[743]*743spondent Arthur M. Schack. Dickerson, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A.D.3d 742, 950 N.Y.S.2d 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-schack-nyappdiv-2012.