Lewis v. Rapelyea

New York Supreme Court

Lewis v. Rapelyea

1 Barb. 29

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 11, 1847

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Barb. 29 (Lewis v. Rapelyea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Rapelyea, 1 Barb. 29 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Edmonds, I.

The rule applied for cannot be granted. The

only relief which could be granted would be to allow judgment to be entered in the name of the original parties. But that is a right conferred by statute, (2 R. S. 387, § 4.) and can only be exercised within two terms after plea of confession. This plea was put in last October; and more than two terms having passed, the court has no power in the matter.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edmonds, I.

The rule applied for cannot be granted. The

only relief which could be granted would be to allow judgment to be entered in the name of the original parties. But that is a right conferred by statute, (2 R. S. 387, § 4.) and can only be exercised within two terms after plea of confession. This plea was put in last October; and more than two terms having passed, the court has no power in the matter.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Barb. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-rapelyea-nysupct-1847.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack