Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.
This text of 60 F. 1005 (Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have very carefully considered the petition for ’a rehearing of this case, and the reasons assigned in support of the application. The opinion of the court on file was concurred in by all the judges, and they adhere to the views therein announced. To what we have already said, we simply add that, if the appellant could be regarded as a pioneer in this particular field of invention, still the express limitations of his fourth claim are such as to preclude a decision that the defendant’s turn-over device is within its terms. The application for a rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F. 1005, 8 C.C.A. 680, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-pennsylvania-steel-co-ca3-1894.