Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.

Third Circuit

Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.

60 F. 1005, 8 C.C.A. 680, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2151

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 F. 129 →

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 30, 1894·No. No. 19·Published

Opinion

PEE CUKfAM'.

We have very carefully considered the petition for ’a rehearing of this case, and the reasons assigned in support of the application. The opinion of the court on file was concurred in by all the judges, and they adhere to the views therein announced. To what we have already said, we simply add that, if the appellant could be regarded as a pioneer in this particular field of invention, still the express limitations of his fourth claim are such as to preclude a decision that the defendant’s turn-over device is within its terms. The application for a rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUKfAM'.

We have very carefully considered the petition for ’a rehearing of this case, and the reasons assigned in support of the application. The opinion of the court on file was concurred in by all the judges, and they adhere to the views therein announced. To what we have already said, we simply add that, if the appellant could be regarded as a pioneer in this particular field of invention, still the express limitations of his fourth claim are such as to preclude a decision that the defendant’s turn-over device is within its terms. The application for a rehearing is denied.

Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co., 60 F. 1005, 8 C.C.A. 680, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2151 (3d Cir. 1894).

Pincite

60 F. 1005 (Lewis v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.