Lewis v. . Pate

193 S.E. 20, 212 N.C. 253, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 290
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 13, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 193 S.E. 20 (Lewis v. . Pate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. . Pate, 193 S.E. 20, 212 N.C. 253, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 290 (N.C. 1937).

Opinion

*254 Pee Cueiam.

While there are a number of exceptions in the record, the appellant presents to this Court for determination only one question, to wit: “Does the husband own and have the right to dispose of all the income, rents and profits, products, etc., accruing from an estate held by entirety to such an extent that an execution against him may be levied upon it to the exclusion of any interest the wife may have ?” This question must be answered, in the affirmative. It is well established law in this State that the husband, during coverture and as between himself and the wife, has absolute and exclusive right to the control, use, possession, rents, issues, and profits of property held as tenants by the entirety. The common-law rule still prevails. Davis v. Bass, 188 N. C., 200; Bynum v. Wicker, 141 N. C., 95; Greenville v. Gornto, 161 N. C., 342; Dorsey v. Kirkland, 177 N. C., 523; Simonton v. Cornelius, 98 N. C., 437; Bryant v. Bryant, 193 N. C., 372; 30 C. J., 567.

We have examined the other exceptions contained in the record and find them without substantial merit. In the trial of this cause below there was

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Produce v. Massengill
208 S.E.2d 709 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Hodge v. Hodge
183 S.E.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Dearman v. Bruns
181 S.E.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
L & M GAS COMPANY v. Leggett
161 S.E.2d 23 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Whitehead ex rel. Whitehead v. Margel
220 F. Supp. 933 (W.D. North Carolina, 1963)
Grabenhofer v. Garrett
131 S.E.2d 675 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Moore v. Glotzbach
188 F. Supp. 267 (E.D. Virginia, 1960)
TERRY AND COMPANY v. Hensen
297 P.2d 213 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1956)
Taylor v. Taylor
92 S.E.2d 136 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hart
106 F.2d 269 (Third Circuit, 1939)
Embler v. . Lumber Co.
83 S.E. 740 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E. 20, 212 N.C. 253, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-pate-nc-1937.