Lewis v. Pataki

Second Circuit

Lewis v. Pataki

60 F. App'x 886

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 2003

DocketNo. 02-0076

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. App'x 886 (Lewis v. Pataki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Pataki, 60 F. App'x 886 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of April, two thousand and three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Having reviewed all of the Appellants’ claims, and finding in them no merit, the thorough and careful judgment of the District Court sua sponte dismissing the Appellants’ Complaint for failure to state a claim is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of April, two thousand and three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Having reviewed all of the Appellants’ claims, and finding in them no merit, the thorough and careful judgment of the District Court sua sponte dismissing the Appellants’ Complaint for failure to state a claim is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. App'x 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-pataki-ca2-2003.