Lewis v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lewis v. Page

1967 OK CR 230, 435 P.2d 622, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 472

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 20, 1967

DocketNo. A-14486

StatusPublished

This text of 1967 OK CR 230 (Lewis v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Page, 1967 OK CR 230, 435 P.2d 622, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 472 (Okla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioner seeks his release from confinement in an application for habeas corpus. His petition, which was filed on the 26th day of October, 1967, was set for hearing on the 30th day of November, 1967, and prior to that date, petitioner was informed by this Court that it appeared he was seeking post conviction review, but had not provided sufficient information for this Court to act thereon. The application for habeas corpus does not set forth sufficient grounds to grant the relief prayed for and [623]*623the petitioner, not having provided sufficient information prior to November 30, 1967, for this Court to consider his application for habeas corpus as an application for post conviction review, it is the order of this Court that the petitioner’s application for habeas corpus be denied and dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner filing a subsequent application for post conviction review with sufficient information provided this Court to entertain the same. Writ denied,

BRETT, J., and NIX, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioner seeks his release from confinement in an application for habeas corpus. His petition, which was filed on the 26th day of October, 1967, was set for hearing on the 30th day of November, 1967, and prior to that date, petitioner was informed by this Court that it appeared he was seeking post conviction review, but had not provided sufficient information for this Court to act thereon. The application for habeas corpus does not set forth sufficient grounds to grant the relief prayed for and [623]*623the petitioner, not having provided sufficient information prior to November 30, 1967, for this Court to consider his application for habeas corpus as an application for post conviction review, it is the order of this Court that the petitioner’s application for habeas corpus be denied and dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner filing a subsequent application for post conviction review with sufficient information provided this Court to entertain the same. Writ denied,

BRETT, J., and NIX, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1967 OK CR 230, 435 P.2d 622, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-page-oklacrimapp-1967.