Lewis v. Oddo

Fourth Circuit

Lewis v. Oddo

668 F. App'x 450

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2016·No. No. 16-6170·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Lewis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lewis v. Oddo, No, 5:14-cv-00108-FPS-RWT, 2016 WL 325129 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Lewis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lewis v. Oddo, No, 5:14-cv-00108-FPS-RWT, 2016 WL 325129 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lewis v. Oddo, 668 F. App'x 450 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

668 F. App'x 450 (Lewis v. Oddo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related