Lewis v. Niles
This text of 1 Root 346 (Lewis v. Niles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment — Motion in arrest insufficient; if there is any set of words laid in the declaration, which are actionable, the plaintiff hath right to recover, and the court will presume the jury have done right in the assessment of damages. Besides upon the whole view of the case it appears that the plaintiff has a good cause of action: further the defendant might have demurred to the insufficient sets of words, and put the question to the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Root 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-niles-conn-1791.