Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority

262 A.D.2d 16, 690 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6186

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered January 20, 1998, which, in a proceeding to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s public housing tenancy upon his failure to appear at an administrative hearing on charges of chronic rent delinquency, granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is time-barred because it was not brought within four months of the date that petitioner acknowledges receipt of notice of the determination terminating his tenancy upon his failure to appear at the administrative hearing (CPLR 217; see, 90-92 Wadsworth Ave. Tenants Assn. v City of New York, 227 AD2d 331). We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered January 20, 1998, which, in a proceeding to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s public housing tenancy upon his failure to appear at an administrative hearing on charges of chronic rent delinquency, granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is time-barred because it was not brought within four months of the date that petitioner acknowledges receipt of notice of the determination terminating his tenancy upon his failure to appear at the administrative hearing (CPLR 217; see, 90-92 Wadsworth Ave. Tenants Assn. v City of New York, 227 AD2d 331). We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.

Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority, 262 A.D.2d 16, 690 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

262 A.D.2d 16 (Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related