Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority

262 A.D.2d 16, 690 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6186

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 16 (Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. New York City Housing Authority, 262 A.D.2d 16, 690 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered January 20, 1998, which, in a proceeding to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s public housing tenancy upon his failure to appear at an administrative hearing on charges of chronic rent delinquency, granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is time-barred because it was not brought within four months of the date that petitioner acknowledges receipt of notice of the determination terminating his tenancy upon his failure to appear at the administrative hearing (CPLR 217; see, 90-92 Wadsworth Ave. Tenants Assn. v City of New York, 227 AD2d 331). We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered January 20, 1998, which, in a proceeding to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s public housing tenancy upon his failure to appear at an administrative hearing on charges of chronic rent delinquency, granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is time-barred because it was not brought within four months of the date that petitioner acknowledges receipt of notice of the determination terminating his tenancy upon his failure to appear at the administrative hearing (CPLR 217; see, 90-92 Wadsworth Ave. Tenants Assn. v City of New York, 227 AD2d 331). We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 16, 690 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack