Lewis v. Neslund

257 N.W. 666, 128 Neb. 98, 1934 Neb. LEXIS 168
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1934·No. No. 29081·Published

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is a suit in equity to foreclose a tax lien arid the lien of a mortgage on real estate. A decree of foreclosure was entered but not presented for review. The real estate was sold at judicial sale under the decree of foreclosure and the sale was confirmed. The owner of the real estate appealed.

The appeal presents the question of the adequacy of the price for which the encumbered property was sold at the judicial sale. The witnesses differed in their estimates of value, but an examination of the evidence leads to the conclusion that there was no such a discrepancy between the sale price and the evidential value as to require a reversal in the light of the following rule:

“A judicial sale of real estate will not be set aside on account of mere inadequacy of price, unless such inadequacy is so gross as to make it appear that it was the result of fraud or mistake.” Hill v. Campbell, 125 Neb. 585.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Neslund, 257 N.W. 666, 128 Neb. 98, 1934 Neb. LEXIS 168 (Neb. 1934).

257 N.W. 666 (Lewis v. Neslund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Campbell
251 N.W. 106 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1933)