Lewis v. Navy Federal Credit Union

Fourth Circuit

Lewis v. Navy Federal Credit Union

485 F. App'x 621

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2012·No. No. 12-1623·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Esther Lewis appeals from the district .court’s orders dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order lifting the automatic stay to allow foreclosure, and denying her motion for reconsideration. Lewis’ appeal was dismissed after she failed, after notice, to timely file her appeal brief and designation of the record on appeal. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8006. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8001(a); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir.1995); In re Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir.1992). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Esther Lewis appeals from the district .court’s orders dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order lifting the automatic stay to allow foreclosure, and denying her motion for reconsideration. Lewis’ appeal was dismissed after she failed, after notice, to timely file her appeal brief and designation of the record on appeal. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8006. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8001(a); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir.1995); In re Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir.1992). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis v. Navy Federal Credit Union, 485 F. App'x 621 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

485 F. App'x 621 (Lewis v. Navy Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related