Lewis v. Moran

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. Moran

179 S.W.3d 469, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2005 WL 3466447

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2005

DocketED 86431

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.W.3d 469 (Lewis v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Moran, 179 S.W.3d 469, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2005 WL 3466447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

F.E. Moran, employer, and Zurich North America, insurer, (collectively referred to as Moran) appeal from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) which found Mark Lewis (Lewis) permanently and totally disabled solely due to the work-related injury sustained on August 8, 2001, and awarded permanent and total disability benefits against Moran. On appeal, Moran argues the Commission erred in finding (1) Lewis permanently and totally disabled as a result of his August 8, 2001 accident, and (2) no Second Injury Fund (Fund) liability. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

F.E. Moran, employer, and Zurich North America, insurer, (collectively referred to as Moran) appeal from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) which found Mark Lewis (Lewis) permanently and totally disabled solely due to the work-related injury sustained on August 8, 2001, and awarded permanent and total disability benefits against Moran. On appeal, Moran argues the Commission erred in finding (1) Lewis permanently and totally disabled as a result of his August 8, 2001 accident, and (2) no Second Injury Fund (Fund) liability. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.W.3d 469, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2005 WL 3466447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-moran-moctapp-2005.