Lewis v. Microsoft Corp.
This text of 222 F. App'x 290 (Lewis v. Microsoft Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brenda D. Lewis, M.A.S., J.D., and William L. Flowers, Jr., appeal the district court’s order granting Microsoft Corporation’s motions for summary judgment and to dismiss, and denying relief in their civil action in which they alleged various claims concerning trademark infringement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Microsoft Corp., 410 F.Supp.2d 432 (E.D.N.C.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 F. App'x 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-microsoft-corp-ca4-2007.