Lewis v. Mandeville
This text of 1 D.C. 360 (Lewis v. Mandeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These facts being admitted,
suffered the deposition to be read, not having decided, and being still doubtful whether an attachment can properly issue and run into the State of Virginia, within one hundred miles, but intimated that they would hear an argument in a full Court, on a motion for a new trial, on the ground of admitting improper evidence. Voss v. Luke, [ante, 331]; Woods v. Young, [ante, 346]; Park's Adm'r v. Willis, [ante, 357.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 D.C. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-mandeville-dcd-1806.