Lewis v. Mandeville

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Lewis v. Mandeville

15 F. Cas. 486, 1 Cranch 360

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. Cas. 486 (Lewis v. Mandeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Mandeville, 15 F. Cas. 486, 1 Cranch 360 (circtddc 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Taylor, for plaintiff, offered the deposition of Anthony Moore, taken in Alexandria, de bene esse, under the laws of Virginia, and stated that the witness was a person employed in transporting the mail, and that his residence is near Winchester, not one hundred miles distant. That he does not know where he now is, but that he is not in the district. A subpoena has been issued and return served. These facts being admitted, THE COURT (DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent) suffered the deposition to be read, not having decided, and being still doubtful whether an attachment can properly issue and run into the state of Virginia, within one hundred miles, but intimated that they would hear an argument in a full court, on a motion for a new trial, on the ground of admitting improper evidence. Voss v. Luke [Case No. 17,014]; Woods v. Young [Id. 17,994]; Park’s Adm’r v. Willis [Id. 10,-716].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Taylor, for plaintiff, offered the deposition of Anthony Moore, taken in Alexandria, de bene esse, under the laws of Virginia, and stated that the witness was a person employed in transporting the mail, and that his residence is near Winchester, not one hundred miles distant. That he does not know where he now is, but that he is not in the district. A subpoena has been issued and return served. These facts being admitted, THE COURT (DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent) suffered the deposition to be read, not having decided, and being still doubtful whether an attachment can properly issue and run into the state of Virginia, within one hundred miles, but intimated that they would hear an argument in a full court, on a motion for a new trial, on the ground of admitting improper evidence. Voss v. Luke [Case No. 17,014]; Woods v. Young [Id. 17,994]; Park’s Adm’r v. Willis [Id. 10,-716].

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 486, 1 Cranch 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-mandeville-circtddc-1806.