Lewis v. Lyon Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Lewis v. Lyon Co.

66 So. 206, 107 Miss. 763

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Since chapter 214 of the Acts of 1910 contains no language which discloses either an express or implied intention on the part of the legislature that it should have a retrospective effect, and since we must decline to overrule the case of Howie v. Alford, 100 Miss. 485, 56 So. 798, the decree of the court below must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Since chapter 214 of the Acts of 1910 contains no language which discloses either an express or implied intention on the part of the legislature that it should have a retrospective effect, and since we must decline to overrule the case of Howie v. Alford, 100 Miss. 485, 56 So. 798, the decree of the court below must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Lewis v. Lyon Co., 66 So. 206, 107 Miss. 763 (Mich. 1914).

Pincite

66 So. 206 (Lewis v. Lyon Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related