Lewis v. Ludlam

204 A.D. 889, 197 N.Y.S. 926

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Defendant’s proposed finding of fact, numbered VI, is found, on authority of Masset v. Ruh (202 App. Div. 522). Present — Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Ludlam, 204 A.D. 889, 197 N.Y.S. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

204 A.D. 889 (Lewis v. Ludlam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Masset v. Ruh
202 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)