Lewis v. Ludlam
204 A.D. 889, 197 N.Y.S. 926
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1922
StatusPublished
This text of 204 A.D. 889 (Lewis v. Ludlam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lewis v. Ludlam, 204 A.D. 889, 197 N.Y.S. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Defendant’s proposed finding of fact, numbered VI, is found, on authority of Masset v. Ruh (202 App. Div. 522). Present — Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Masset v. Ruh
202 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
204 A.D. 889, 197 N.Y.S. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-ludlam-nyappdiv-1922.