Lewis v. Linden Steel Co.

38 A. 606, 183 Pa. 248, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 749
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 108·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the final decree dismissing exceptions to the learned auditor’s second report and ordering distribution in accordance with the ¿ccompanying schedule. A careful con- , sideration of the questions presented by the record has satisfied us that there is no substantial error in the decree. For reasons given in the opinion of the court, filed March 24, 1897, the decree should not be disturbed.

Decreé affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Linden Steel Co., 38 A. 606, 183 Pa. 248, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 749 (Pa. 1897).

38 A. 606 (Lewis v. Linden Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. Harrisburg Manufacturing & Boiler Co.
19 Pa. D. & C. 558 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.
153 A. 205 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1931)
Cox v. Snow
273 P. 933 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1929)
Central Trust Co. v. H. B. Mehring Co.
141 A. 111 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1928)
Wigton v. Climax Coal Co.
113 A. 425 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Ball v. Improved Property Holding Co. of New York
247 F. 645 (Second Circuit, 1917)
U. S. Investment Corp. v. Portland Hospital
64 P. 644 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)