Lewis v. . Lewis
144 S.E. 924, 196 N.C. 801, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 401
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. . Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 N.C. 267 →
Opinion
As all the evidence of any probative value, adduced on the hearing, tends to support the defendant’s plea of sole seizin, with none to defeat it, we cannot say there was error in the peremptory instruction of which the plaintiffs complain. See Lewis v. Lewis, this same case, reported in 194 N. C., 406, 139 S. E., 772.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. . Lewis, 144 S.E. 924, 196 N.C. 801, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 401 (N.C. 1928).
144 S.E. 924 (Lewis v. . Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. . Lewis
139 S.E. 772 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)