Lewis v. Lewis

667 So. 2d 390, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12467, 1995 WL 710184
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 689 So. 2d 1271
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1995·No. No. 94-3920·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

“Each order for child support shall contain a provision for health insurance for the minor child when the insurance is reasonably available.” Section 61.13(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1993). In the final order of dissolution of marriage, the trial court determined that ap-pellee has maintained health insurance for the two children through his employment, but neglected to order appellee to continue providing such coverage. See, e.g., Butler v. Butler, 622 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“[e]ven if the husband is providing insurance, this does not abrogate the requirement of making it a legal obligation pursuant to the final judgment”). Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions to amend the order, in accordance with section 61.13(1)(b), by requiring appellee to continue to provide health insurance for the children so long as it continues to be reasonably available. In all other respects, the final order is affirmed.

JOANOS, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Lewis, 667 So. 2d 390, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12467, 1995 WL 710184 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

667 So. 2d 390 (Lewis v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. Butler
622 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)