Lewis v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewis v. Kaplan

18 A.D.2d 829, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4646

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 829 (Lewis v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Kaplan, 18 A.D.2d 829, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit and enjoin the State Civil Service Commission from prosecuting any proceedings before it (pursuant to section 25 of the Civil Service Law) for the purpose of rescinding the appointment of the petitioner to the position of patrolman in the Suffolk County Police Department, and revoking his eligibility for such appointment, the commission appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 11, 1961, which granted the application (see 27 Misc 2d 15). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion (see Matter of Dobler v. Kaplan, 18 A D 2d 828). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit and enjoin the State Civil Service Commission from prosecuting any proceedings before it (pursuant to section 25 of the Civil Service Law) for the purpose of rescinding the appointment of the petitioner to the position of patrolman in the Suffolk County Police Department, and revoking his eligibility for such appointment, the commission appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 11, 1961, which granted the application (see 27 Misc 2d 15). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion (see Matter of Dobler v. Kaplan, 18 A D 2d 828). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 829, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack