Lewis v. James
88 So. 3d 381, 2012 WL 1676769, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7546
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-4201
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 88 So. 3d 381 (Lewis v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lewis v. James, 88 So. 3d 381, 2012 WL 1676769, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Franklin v. Kearney, 814 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (only the committing court has jurisdiction to entertain habeas petition challenging legality of involuntary commitment). Mr. Lewis does not adequately present any of his “bill of rights” claims in [382]*382his initial brief. See § 916.107, Fla. Stat. (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wood v. Polisknowski, Harris
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 So. 3d 381, 2012 WL 1676769, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-james-fladistctapp-2012.