Lewis v. James

88 So. 3d 381, 2012 WL 1676769, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7546
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2012·No. No. 1D11-4201·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Franklin v. Kearney, 814 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (only the committing court has jurisdiction to entertain habeas petition challenging legality of involuntary commitment). Mr. Lewis does not adequately present any of his “bill of rights” claims in [382]*382his initial brief. See § 916.107, Fla. Stat. (2010).

BENTON, C.J., THOMAS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. James, 88 So. 3d 381, 2012 WL 1676769, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 381 (Lewis v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. Polisknowski, Harris
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024