Lewis v. Hummel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewis v. Hummel

65 A.D.3d 898, 884 N.Y.S.2d 861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 8, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.3d 898 (Lewis v. Hummel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Hummel, 65 A.D.3d 898, 884 N.Y.S.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment,

Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered August 28, 2009, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petitioner’s motion to validate the petition denied.

Supreme Court abused its discretion in rejecting the credibility determinations of the Special Referee. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence of record to validate the 39 “D’Ornellas” signatures. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment,

Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered August 28, 2009, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petitioner’s motion to validate the petition denied.

Supreme Court abused its discretion in rejecting the credibility determinations of the Special Referee. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence of record to validate the 39 “D’Ornellas” signatures. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.3d 898, 884 N.Y.S.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-hummel-nyappdiv-2009.