Lewis v. Healy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewis v. Healy

172 A.D. 901, 157 N.Y.S. 131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 901 (Lewis v. Healy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Healy, 172 A.D. 901, 157 N.Y.S. 131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think that the order for the examination was sought, not for the purpose of proving facts in defense, but in order to examine the plaintiff as to the necessary elements of his cause of action. The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for examination granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think that the order for the examination was sought, not for the purpose of proving facts in defense, but in order to examine the plaintiff as to the necessary elements of his cause of action. The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for examination granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 901, 157 N.Y.S. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-healy-nyappdiv-1916.