Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 20, 2012
DocketCivil Action No. 2012-0088
StatusPublished

This text of Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia (Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2012).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L E D FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAN 2 0 2012

CIerk, U.S. D\strict & Bankruptcy

RADCLIFFE B' LEWIS’ Courts for the District of Co|umbia

Plaintiff, : v. § civnAcrionNo. 12 {}(]88

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBlA, el al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

P1aintiff claims to have "won the December 11, 1999 Powerball game round," Compl. at 2, and his repeated efforts to claim the lottery proceeds have been unsuccessful, see generally ia'. at 4-7. He demands a declaratory judgment "affrnning that [he] has standing to claim the December 11, 1999 Powerball ticket," ia’. at 9, and deeming him "the Winner of the December 11, 1999 Powerball Game Round," z`a'. at 10, as well as monetary compensation of "US $24,50(),000.00 . . . in redemption . . . for the December 11, 1999 Powerball," z'a'., among other relief.

Notwithstanding plaintiff s characterization of this case, see z'a’. at 4, either as a civil rights action against the defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, or as claim over which this Court has diversity jurisdiction, see Compl. at 2, it actually is a tort claim for the recovery of lottery

winnings to which the plaintiff claims an entitlement. Absent a clear showing of this Court’s

subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An Order

A€l/

istrict Judge

U 'edSa( D _qg)ww/ ”“*'“‘“7

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: j

h

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-government-of-the-district-of-columbia-dcd-2012.