Lewis v. Forehand
45 S.E. 68, 117 Ga. 798, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 340
Opinion
Where, on the trial in a mayor’s court of one accused of a violation of a municipal ordinance, the accused is convicted and sentenced to pay a fine, the court may subsequently, during the same term, amend its judgment by adding an alternative sentence to a term upon the public works, such alternative sentence being within the provision of the law under which the accused was convicted. 17 Am. &Eng. Ene. L. (2ded.) 813 ; Meaders v. State, 96 Ga. 301. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. Forehand, 45 S.E. 68, 117 Ga. 798, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 340 (Ga. 1903).
45 S.E. 68 (Lewis v. Forehand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Kearney
20 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1822)
Ex Parte Tobias Watkins
28 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1830)
Ex Parte Parks
93 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1876)
Dauchy v. Brown
41 Barb. 555 (New York Supreme Court, 1863)
Jobe v. State
28 Ga. 235 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1859)
Lark v. State
55 Ga. 435 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1875)
Baker v. Thompson
75 Ga. 164 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Calloway v. McElmurray
91 Ga. 166 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)
Jordan v. Tarver
17 S.E. 351 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)
Meaders v. State
22 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Hamilton v. State
22 S.E. 528 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Taylor v. Lusk
9 Iowa 444 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1859)
Johnson v. United States
13 F. Cas. 867 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1842)