Lewis v. Ford
This text of 286 S.E.2d 714 (Lewis v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner was convicted of five counts of theft by receiving stolen property and sentenced to ten years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. An appeal apparently was taken, but was later withdrawn.
Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition in the Superior Court of DeKalb County, and a hearing was held on April 29, 1981. Habeas relief was denied on the following ground: “Where a Petitioner, as in the instant case, has intentionally failed to exhaust his appellate remedies, habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy. Moye v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 231 (1975).”
We must disagree with the trial court’s ruling that, under Moye, petitioner’s failure to pursue an appeal precludes all habeas relief. Moye specifically states that, although “ ‘habeas corpus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal or other remedial procedure for the correction of errors [or]... as a second appeal for such purpose [, it] is [otherwise] an appropriate remedy . . . when the judgment or sentence under which applicant is being restrained is not merely erroneous but is absolutely void.’ [Cits.]” Id. at 231.
Petitioner’s failure to pursue an appeal did not, ipso facto, render habeas corpus an “[in]appropriáte remedy.” See Hammock v. Zant, 243 Ga. 259 (253 SE2d 727) (1979); see also McDuffie v. Jones, 248 Ga. 544 (283 SE2d 601) (1981). Accordingly, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Judgment vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 S.E.2d 714, 248 Ga. 820, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-ford-ga-1982.