Lewis v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Fifth Circuit

Lewis v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

155 F.2d 523, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 14, 1946·No. No. 10002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are in no doubt that the dismissal order appealed from was rightly entered and should be affirmed.

On the argument it appeared quite plain to us on the face of the papers that this was so, and we were disposed to so announce. In view, however, of appellants’ earnest insistence to the contrary, we have carefully reread the record, subjecting it to the most critical inspection and' analysis, and we have found no support in it whatever for appellants’ view. This being so, no useful purpose would be served by setting any of the record out here. It is sufficient to say that the judgment was right and must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are in no doubt that the dismissal order appealed from was rightly entered and should be affirmed.

On the argument it appeared quite plain to us on the face of the papers that this was so, and we were disposed to so announce. In view, however, of appellants’ earnest insistence to the contrary, we have carefully reread the record, subjecting it to the most critical inspection and' analysis, and we have found no support in it whatever for appellants’ view. This being so, no useful purpose would be served by setting any of the record out here. It is sufficient to say that the judgment was right and must be affirmed.

Lewis v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 155 F.2d 523, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236 (5th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

155 F.2d 523 (Lewis v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.