Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

539 F. App'x 187
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2013·No. No. 13-6262·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Lee Lewis appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 5:11-cv-00054-JPB-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 539 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2013).

539 F. App'x 187 (Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related