Lewis v. Fausett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lewis v. Fausett

177 So. 2d 550

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1965

DocketNo. G-240

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 2d 550 (Lewis v. Fausett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Fausett, 177 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal read and given full consideration. It is our conclusion that the summary decree appealed herein should be affirmed on the authority of Richardson et al. v. Holman, (1948) 160 Fla. 65, 33 So.2d 641. We are of the view that the facts in the case sub judice are so clearly distinguishable from those present in the cases of Dade County et al. v. City of North Miami Beach, (Fla. 1953) 69 So.2d 780, and Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. v. City of Miami, (Fla.App. 1958) 104 So.2d 851, that the principles of law governing those cases neither influence nor control the decision in this case. Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal read and given full consideration. It is our conclusion that the summary decree appealed herein should be affirmed on the authority of Richardson et al. v. Holman, (1948) 160 Fla. 65, 33 So.2d 641. We are of the view that the facts in the case sub judice are so clearly distinguishable from those present in the cases of Dade County et al. v. City of North Miami Beach, (Fla. 1953) 69 So.2d 780, and Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. v. City of Miami, (Fla.App. 1958) 104 So.2d 851, that the principles of law governing those cases neither influence nor control the decision in this case. Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 2d 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-fausett-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack