Lewis v. Executive Office for United State Attorneys
This text of Lewis v. Executive Office for United State Attorneys (Lewis v. Executive Office for United State Attorneys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ : ANTHONY LEWIS, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 09-0746 (RBW) : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, : : Defendant. : _________________________________________ :
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The defendant filed its third renewed motion for summary judgment [Dkt. #72] on
November 17, 2011. In its November 21, 2011 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among
other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that
Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by December 21,
2011, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an
opposition nor requested additional time to do so. The Court will treat the defendant’s motion as
conceded. With this concession, and the Court’s conclusion that only the exempt records or
portions of records have been withheld, no issues remain for the Court’s resolution.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge DATE: January 9, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lewis v. Executive Office for United State Attorneys, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-executive-office-for-united-state-attorney-dcd-2012.