Lewis v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
25 S.E. 728, 99 Ga. 336
Opinions
Where a 'second verdict has been rendered on substantially t'he same issues of fact in favor of the same party, the rule of discretion applicable to the first grant of a new trial does not apply, and if at the last trial there was nothing objectionable in the rulings of the presiding judge, and the evidence, though conflicting, supported the second verdict, it should not be set aside. Veal et al. v. Robinson, 76 Ga. 838.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 25 S.E. 728, 99 Ga. 336 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 728 (Lewis v. Equitable Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ansley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
71 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Stewart v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
60 S.E. 1 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Scribner's Sons v. Mutual Building Co.
58 S.E. 240 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)