Lewis v. Elledge-Levota

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. Elledge-Levota

493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 2016 WL 3610915

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2016·No. WD 79147·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gabrielle Elledge-LeVota appeals from the trial court’s judgment issuing of a full order of protection against her in favor of Anita Lewis because she argues Ms. Lewis failed to prove the essential elements of “stalking” under section 455.040 in that “there was no evidence that [Ms. Elledge-LeVota] initiated ‘repeated’ contact” with Ms. Lewis. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been-issued to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gabrielle Elledge-LeVota appeals from the trial court’s judgment issuing of a full order of protection against her in favor of Anita Lewis because she argues Ms. Lewis failed to prove the essential elements of “stalking” under section 455.040 in that “there was no evidence that [Ms. Elledge-LeVota] initiated ‘repeated’ contact” with Ms. Lewis. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been-issued to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Lewis v. Elledge-Levota, 493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 2016 WL 3610915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

493 S.W.3d 451 (Lewis v. Elledge-Levota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.