Lewis v. Elledge-Levota

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. Elledge-Levota

493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 2016 WL 3610915

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 2016

DocketWD 79147

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 451 (Lewis v. Elledge-Levota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Elledge-Levota, 493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 2016 WL 3610915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gabrielle Elledge-LeVota appeals from the trial court’s judgment issuing of a full order of protection against her in favor of Anita Lewis because she argues Ms. Lewis failed to prove the essential elements of “stalking” under section 455.040 in that “there was no evidence that [Ms. Elledge-LeVota] initiated ‘repeated’ contact” with Ms. Lewis. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been-issued to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gabrielle Elledge-LeVota appeals from the trial court’s judgment issuing of a full order of protection against her in favor of Anita Lewis because she argues Ms. Lewis failed to prove the essential elements of “stalking” under section 455.040 in that “there was no evidence that [Ms. Elledge-LeVota] initiated ‘repeated’ contact” with Ms. Lewis. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been-issued to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 2016 WL 3610915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-elledge-levota-moctapp-2016.