Lewis v. District of Columbia Public Schools

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. District of Columbia Public Schools. Read the opinion of the Court — 885 F. Supp. 2d 421
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 17, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1999·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

ANGEL LEWIS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 11-01999 (RMC)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Partially Dismiss Amended Complaint [Dkt. 4] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss the negative evaluation as a retaliatory action in Count I is GRANTED and the allegation is dismissed without prejudice; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss Count II is GRANTED as conceded and Count II is dismissed with prejudice; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss the alleged falsification of time sheets and failure to file timely workers’ compensation documents as retaliatory acts under Title VII is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint no later than September 17, 2012, should she choose to do so. Failure to file a timely amended complaint may result in waiver of potential claims addressed in this memorandum.

SO ORDERED.

Date: August 17, 2012 /s/ ROSEMARY M. COLLYER

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. District of Columbia Public Schools, (D.D.C. 2012).

Lewis v. District of Columbia Public Schools (Lewis v. District of Columbia Public Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.