Lewis v. Compass

885 So. 2d 562, 2004 La. LEXIS 3154
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 29, 2004·No. No. 2004-CC-1666·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ Granted. As Judge Murray notes in her dissent in the court of appeal, because the determinative facts on the prescription issue are not disputed and because the prescription issue is a legal one, the trial court abused its discretion in referring the exception of prescription to the merits. Accordingly, the trial court order referring the exception of prescription to the merits is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for trial of the peremptory exception of prescription.

KIMBALL and JOHNSON, JJ., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Compass, 885 So. 2d 562, 2004 La. LEXIS 3154 (La. 2004).

885 So. 2d 562 (Lewis v. Compass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co.
885 So. 2d 562 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)