Lewis v. City of Pineville
170 So. 2d 5, 247 La. 102
Opinions
This case1 is a companion of Ammen et al. v. City of Pineville et al., 247 La. 89, 170 So.2d 1, in which this Court has assigned its reasons for judgment. The issue here is identical. For the reasons there assigned, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is affirmed at plaintiff’s cost.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. City of Pineville, 170 So. 2d 5, 247 La. 102 (La. 1964).
170 So. 2d 5 (Lewis v. City of Pineville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gour v. Daray Motor Co., Inc.
373 So. 2d 571 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)
Moore v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
364 So. 2d 630 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Ruckstuhl
348 So. 2d 701 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)
Guste v. Demars
330 So. 2d 123 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1976)
State, Department of Highways v. Mondel, Inc.
262 So. 2d 560 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1972)
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hunt
231 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1970)
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Browne
224 So. 2d 51 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Baddock
170 So. 2d 867 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
State v. Baddock
170 So. 2d 5 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)