Lewis v. Boucher

Fourth Circuit

Lewis v. Boucher

73 F. App'x 648

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 8, 2003·No. No. 02-2466·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Wesley Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, pursuant to the jury’s verdict. Lewis has not provided a transcript, and he fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lewis v. Boucher, No. CA-00-566-7 (WD.Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Wesley Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, pursuant to the jury’s verdict. Lewis has not provided a transcript, and he fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lewis v. Boucher, No. CA-00-566-7 (WD.Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis v. Boucher, 73 F. App'x 648 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

73 F. App'x 648 (Lewis v. Boucher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related