Lewis v. Boucher

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 2003
Docket02-2466
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lewis v. Boucher (Lewis v. Boucher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. Boucher, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2466

WILBERT WESLEY LEWIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

CITY OF ROANOKE; ATLAS GASKINS, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-566-7)

Submitted: July 22, 2003 Decided: September 8, 2003

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert Wesley Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Wesley Lewis appeals the district court’s order

denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, pursuant to

the jury’s verdict. Lewis has not provided a transcript, and he

fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at

government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed

the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lewis v.

Boucher, No. CA-00-566-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reporters
28 U.S.C. § 753(f)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lewis v. Boucher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-boucher-ca4-2003.