Lewis v. Bledsoe
This text of Lewis v. Bledsoe (Lewis v. Bledsoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6057
TORREULLA LEWIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-506-JLK)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Torreulla Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Torreulla Lewis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Lewis v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-506-JLK (W.D. Va. Dec. 2,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lewis v. Bledsoe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-bledsoe-ca4-2006.