Lewis v. Beach

516 F. App'x 264
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2013
DocketNo. 12-7966
StatusPublished

This text of 516 F. App'x 264 (Lewis v. Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. Beach, 516 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wayne Lewis appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Beach, No. 3:10-cv-00731-JRS (E.D.Va. July 27 & Nov. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 F. App'x 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-beach-ca4-2013.