Lewis v. Astrue
This text of Lewis v. Astrue (Lewis v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARY ANN LEWIS, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No.: 08-1202 (RMU) v. : : Document Nos.: 7, 9 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : Commissioner, : Social Security Administration, : : Defendant. :
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WITH REMAND AND DENYING AS MOOT THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF REVERSAL
On July 15, 2008, the plaintiff filed a complaint in the above-captioned matter. On
November 20, 2008, the plaintiff then filed a motion for judgment of reversal. On January 21,
2009, the defendant filed a consent motion requesting that the court “enter a judgment that
reverses the final decision of defendant and that remands the cause to the defendant for further
administrative proceedings.” The court grants the consent motion for entry of judgment with
remand and, accordingly, denies as moot the plaintiff’s motion for judgment of reversal. An
Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and contemporaneously issued
this 30th day of January, 2009.
RICARDO M. URBINA United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lewis v. Astrue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-astrue-dcd-2009.