Lewis v. Ash

2 Miles 110
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedJune 19, 1837
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Miles 110 (Lewis v. Ash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. Ash, 2 Miles 110 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1837).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.—

The warrant of attorney authorized the entry of either a joint or a several judgment on the bond. The plaintiff did not enter a several judgment, but a joint one. At the time of so doing, one of the obligors was dead. The judgment was therefore clearly irregular, and must be opened as to all the defendants, and the fieri facias of course must then be set aside. We have no power to comply with the suggestion of the plaintiff’s counsel, as to leaving the judgment stand as to the surviving defendants. The judgment being joint, what is irregular as to one, is so in relation to all

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Trading Corp. v. Scheetz
59 Pa. D. & C. 231 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Miles 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-ash-pactcomplphilad-1837.