Lewis v. Albertson

3 N.J.L. 101
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— The reason relied upon, for the. reversal of this judgment at bar, was the imperfection and. [74]*74insufficiency of the account filed. Upon inspection it seems to me, to be perfectly intelligible. Besides, the defendant appeared and went to trial upon it.

Tear son, for plaintiff.

I am for an affirmance of the judgment.

Rossbrr. J. — Concurred.

Pennington, J.

— I concur in affirming this judgment. The state of demand contains a plain charge for wood sold, not very skilfully made out, but that is not required.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Albertson, 3 N.J.L. 101 (N.J. 1806).

3 N.J.L. 101 (Lewis v. Albertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.