Lewis & Thompson v. Bracken & Wilson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lewis & Thompson v. Bracken & Wilson

97 Ga. 337

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 12, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 Ga. 337 (Lewis & Thompson v. Bracken & Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis & Thompson v. Bracken & Wilson, 97 Ga. 337 (Ga. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

There was no error in allowing the amendments to the declaration; nor in overruling the demurrer to the same; nor in refusing to grant a continuance; nor in admitting or rejecting evidence; the charges complained of were substantially correct; and the verdict was amply supported by the. evidence, and quite reasonable in amount. This case involves no new questions of law rendering necessary a more elaborate statement of the points decided. The court properly refused to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages. Before Judge Bisb. Stewart superior court. April term, 1894.

Watts & Hickey and G. J. Thornton, for plaintiffs in error. Glarke, Hooper & Harrison, W. H. Ellis and J. B. Hudson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

There was no error in allowing the amendments to the declaration; nor in overruling the demurrer to the same; nor in refusing to grant a continuance; nor in admitting or rejecting evidence; the charges complained of were substantially correct; and the verdict was amply supported by the. evidence, and quite reasonable in amount. This case involves no new questions of law rendering necessary a more elaborate statement of the points decided. The court properly refused to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages. Before Judge Bisb. Stewart superior court. April term, 1894.

Watts & Hickey and G. J. Thornton, for plaintiffs in error. Glarke, Hooper & Harrison, W. H. Ellis and J. B. Hudson, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 Ga. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-thompson-v-bracken-wilson-ga-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack