Lewis State Bank v. Raker

171 So. 319, 126 Fla. 477, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1634

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 11, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This appeal was taken from an order denying the motion of the defendant, appellant here, to dismiss appellee’s bill of complaint.

As the bill was not without equity, no error was committed in denying the motion to dismiss. The order appealed from is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal was taken from an order denying the motion of the defendant, appellant here, to dismiss appellee’s bill of complaint.

As the bill was not without equity, no error was committed in denying the motion to dismiss. The order appealed from is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Lewis State Bank v. Raker, 171 So. 319, 126 Fla. 477, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1634 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

171 So. 319 (Lewis State Bank v. Raker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.