Lewis M. Horn and Robert B. McGregor v. United States District Court for Eastern District of Michigan

Sixth Circuit

Lewis M. Horn and Robert B. McGregor v. United States District Court for Eastern District of Michigan

196 F.2d 224, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2450

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1952

Docket11550_1

StatusPublished

This text of 196 F.2d 224 (Lewis M. Horn and Robert B. McGregor v. United States District Court for Eastern District of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis M. Horn and Robert B. McGregor v. United States District Court for Eastern District of Michigan, 196 F.2d 224, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2450 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The respondent, Arthur F. Lederle, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, having filed a response to the order to show cause heretofore issued;

And it appearing that subsequent thereto said Court held a hearing in the causes herein referred to, and on March 21, 1952 rendered a decision in the same, and by reason thereof the action sought by the petitioners herein has taken place and the proceeding has become moot;

It Is Ordered that petitioners’ application for a mandamus be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The respondent, Arthur F. Lederle, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, having filed a response to the order to show cause heretofore issued;

And it appearing that subsequent thereto said Court held a hearing in the causes herein referred to, and on March 21, 1952 rendered a decision in the same, and by reason thereof the action sought by the petitioners herein has taken place and the proceeding has become moot;

It Is Ordered that petitioners’ application for a mandamus be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 F.2d 224, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-m-horn-and-robert-b-mcgregor-v-united-states-district-court-for-ca6-1952.